My curtain along dress is done! All but the hand finishing, that is - edges, hems, ties, and 4" of binding. And I love it!
I'm not even wearing my stays in these pictures; I had just put the skirt and sleeves on, and wanted to make sure it wasn't horrible. I ended up loving it so much I didn't want to take it off!

It's a little difficult to get on and off, which really makes me think that either the sewn-together method was not used on the inspiration gown, or that the proportions were different enough that it wasn't a struggle. Still, the fit is all that I could hope for.

The skirt is apron front. Trying for the 1790s "puffy" look, I wanted a lot of fullness in the back, less on the sides, and very little in front. The apron is completely straight, with two deep pleats at either end to keep the opening from gapping. The rest of the skirt is set in 1/4" visible pleats. At the sides they're only 1/4" deep, then shading to 3/4" and finally 1" deep at the center back.

I couldn't get a good picture of the back, although I tried a lot. The red curtains are heavily dyed; even after washing and drying, the fabric feels like it's starched with medium liquid starch. Plus it's sateen, so it's not flimsy. This means that the 1/4" pleats "puff" out very nicely. And it kind of sways and hangs in back in a way that I've never seen cotton do before - and incidentally perfect for this style.
Yay! So excited!

By the way, notice the new furniture behind the mirror? 1926 Singer treadle machine, in working condition. It just needs a new belt. A super nice lady at church just gave it to me! I can't wait to play with it after Costume College. Especially I want to play with all the crazy attachments the old Singers have. ;)
I'm not even wearing my stays in these pictures; I had just put the skirt and sleeves on, and wanted to make sure it wasn't horrible. I ended up loving it so much I didn't want to take it off!

It's a little difficult to get on and off, which really makes me think that either the sewn-together method was not used on the inspiration gown, or that the proportions were different enough that it wasn't a struggle. Still, the fit is all that I could hope for.

The skirt is apron front. Trying for the 1790s "puffy" look, I wanted a lot of fullness in the back, less on the sides, and very little in front. The apron is completely straight, with two deep pleats at either end to keep the opening from gapping. The rest of the skirt is set in 1/4" visible pleats. At the sides they're only 1/4" deep, then shading to 3/4" and finally 1" deep at the center back.

I couldn't get a good picture of the back, although I tried a lot. The red curtains are heavily dyed; even after washing and drying, the fabric feels like it's starched with medium liquid starch. Plus it's sateen, so it's not flimsy. This means that the 1/4" pleats "puff" out very nicely. And it kind of sways and hangs in back in a way that I've never seen cotton do before - and incidentally perfect for this style.
Yay! So excited!

By the way, notice the new furniture behind the mirror? 1926 Singer treadle machine, in working condition. It just needs a new belt. A super nice lady at church just gave it to me! I can't wait to play with it after Costume College. Especially I want to play with all the crazy attachments the old Singers have. ;)
no subject
Date: 2013-07-19 04:37 am (UTC)I'm mildly dubious of what that says about me at this point.
(The dress is lovely, in any case! ...Although, personally, I have a massive disliking for empire waists.)
no subject
Date: 2013-07-19 05:21 am (UTC)I totally understand. I didn't care for high waists myself for a very long time. When I started doing them I figured out how to make them fairly flattering on me. And the construction is (relatively) simple so a new dress isn't a huge time sink. But objectively, out of all historical costumes, it's not my favorite period. And the 70s incarnation leaves me cold.
no subject
Date: 2013-07-20 01:28 am (UTC)I have a gorgeous, silky flutter top that I've never worn, because it has that terrible elastic-under-the-bust empire waist thing going on. I got it in the hopes that my mother could figure out some way to modify it, but, well... she does quilts, not clothes. :(
no subject
Date: 2013-07-20 05:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-07-21 04:23 am (UTC)I dug back and looked at one of your home-decorating brain-dump posts recently. Since some other work on it need doing, I'd like to give my whole bedroom a redo in the (relatively) near future. However, I have very little idea of what style I want to go for.
The post I looked up was that discussion of Japonism. I'd like to take a closer look at that, because I always have enjoyed certain Asian aesthetics, and (as you said) it could work with both my vintage and *cough* other interests. Unfortunately, internet searches for Japonism only tend to turn up art prints, rather than useful/inspiring images of furnishings and decor. :Þ
no subject
Date: 2013-07-25 06:02 am (UTC)Great pics, you can tell even with the slightly awkward angles and lighting that it's a lovely piece of work!